A:The central authority of the Pope, as bishop of Rome, was not really established until after the Great Schism of 1054. , Accordingly, it would be a mistake to expect to find the modern fully developed doctrine of papal primacy in the first centuries, thereby failing to recognize the Church's historical reality. I. Maragou, Οἰκουμενικὰ Α΄[Ecumenical Topics, vol. St. Peter was given special authority by Jesus and was martyred in Rome. [...] No doctrine is defined till it is violated. Furthermore, that the other bishops are only bishops ‘through’ the Pope. 1. Although the council failed to reach agreement on the issue, ecclesiastical communion was preserved. , In 155, Anicetus, bishop of Rome, presided over a church council at Rome that was attended by a number of bishops including Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna. 1998 to begin the Theological School of the University of Thessaloniki. Is this consistent with claims of later popes to the even higher title "Vicar of Christ"? Toward this aim, the contribution of the principle “diversity in unity” is formative11, despite the fact that is it neither historically proven nor theologically acceptable as presented here. Only under the presupposition of his participation in the procedures of the synod was the pope recognized as “head and father and first” of the bishops and patriarchs gathered together; he does not simply make a pronouncement which the others then obey, but “he confers… together with all”. ", The event that is often considered to have been the first conflict between Rome and Constantinople was triggered by the elevation of the see of Constantinople to a position of honour, second only to Rome on the grounds that, as capital of the eastern Roman empire, it was now the "New Rome". “You are a priest for ever according to the order of Melchizedeck” What lesson does Leo draw from this text? How can I get in touch with Denzel Washington's mother lenox? Such an interpretation, it is claimed, has been accepted by many Church Fathers; Tertullian,[c] Hilary of Poitiers,[d] John Chrysostom,[e] Augustine. Papal primacy, also known as the primacy of the bishop of Rome, is a Christian ecclesiological doctrine concerning the respect and authority that is due to the pope from other bishops and their episcopal sees. Copyright © 2020 Multiply Media, LLC. This canon was intended to prevent the recurrence of such abuses. Peter Heers. For God has given it such firmness that the depravity of heretics cannot mar it nor the unbelief of the heathen overcome it. 15 “Unitatis Redintegratio: Decree on Ecumenism” from the Second Vatican Council §3 found online here . And so, dearly beloved, we obediently celebrate today’s festival, in such a way, that in my lowly person he may be recognized and honored – he who takes care of all the shepherds together with his sheep and whose dignity is not diminished even in such an unworthy heir as me. He stressed that he personally was not a greater Christian than others, but as Bishop of Rome he is the embodiment of St Peter, inheriting from him the power and authority that Christ endowed him with in the Gospel. All of the patriarchs as well as the bishop sign stamp or seal and in a unified fashion in agreement with the ranking of honor among the patriarchal Thrones. It is only for the sake of biased polemics that one can ignore these testimonies, their consensus and significance.. Far from being an obstacle to the Church's unity, a certain diversity of customs and observances only adds to her splendor, and is of great help in carrying out her mission, as has already been stated. We might be found weak and slothful in fulfilling the duties of our office, because however great our desire, we are hindered by our frail humanity. Peter has undergraduate, masters and doctoral degrees in Dogmatic Theology from the Theological School Neither can we quote here all testimonies of the fathers and the councils unanimously acknowledging Rome as the senior church and the center of ecumenical agreement. ", In 1983 CIC canon 331, the "bishop of Roman Church" is both the "vicar of Christ" and "pastor of the universal Church on earth. In this sermon, leo claims Peter as the primate of all bishops and assumes he is heir to that. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. This state of affairs, dearly-beloved, was achieved by the Apostle’s confession, which, inspired in his heart by God the Father, rose above all the uncertainty of human opinions, and was given the firmness of a rock, which no assaults could shake. Pope Innocent I (401–417) claimed that all major cases should be reserved to the see of Rome and wrote: "All must preserve that which Peter the prince of the apostles delivered to the church at Rome and which it has watched over until now, and nothing may be added or introduced that lacks this authority or that derives its pattern from somewhere else. Being founded as you are on the very citadel of the Apostolic Rock, not only has our Lord Jesus Christ redeemed you in common with all men, but the blessed Apostle Peter has instructed you far beyond all men. ", "...Peter, the first of the apostles, receive the keys of the kingdom of heaven for the binding and loosing of sins; and for the same congregation of saints, in reference to the perfect repose in the bosom of that mysterious life to come did the evangelist John recline on the breast of Christ. It uproots us from this earth and plants us in heaven, and the gates of Hades cannot prevail against it. After the First and Second Vatican Councils we have —according to Rome— fundamental dogmas of faith which belong to the “essential and unchanging structure of the Church”14 and those who deny them are anathematized by the “ecumenical” Synod of Vatican I and this remains the case with the “ecumenical” Synod of Vatican II. On the contrary, he too was obligated to comply. Fr. 12 From the letter of Pope Agatho read at the Third Synod of Constantinople, available here, , 13 Tr. The ancient Church —in both the East and the West— had recognized a primacy of honor and dignity; but not a primacy of authority (of superior jurisdiction) over the entire Church.  Cyprian wrote Pope Stephen asking him to instruct the bishops of Gaul to condemn Marcianus of Arles, (who refused to admit those who repented) and to elect another bishop in his stead. Thus Schmemman wrote: It is impossible to deny that, even before the appearance of local primacies, the Church from the first days of her existence possessed an ecumenical center of unity and agreement. Were the Western Orthodox Fathers ignored in the committee's search for a common understanding of the role of the Pope in the First Millenium? 3. The perfect observance of this traditional principle not always indeed carried out in practice, is one of the essential prerequisites for any restoration of unity. A series of canons from local Synods and the Holy Fathers approved by the 2nd canon of Constantinople III and the 1st canon of Nicaea II show that that ancient Latin Church of the West recognized, just like the East, that the Church of Rome and her bishop were to be given great reverence and possessed a primacy of honor, but not a primacy of jurisdiction or an infallibility in defining matters of faith: for example, the Acts of the Synods of Carthage in Latin-speaking north Africa as well as their decisions to forbid final appeals to Rome, or the dispute between pope St. Stephen and St. Cyprian about the baptism of heretics all demonstrate this. C. The bishop of Rome in the decisions of the Ecumenical Synods. Luther's rejection of the primacy of the Pope led to the start of the Protestant Reformation, during which numerous Protestant sects broke away from the Catholic Church. The position of the ancient Church has been recorded in an official and categorical manner in the “synodal decree”, the “Horos” of the 5th Ecumenical Synod: “During the common deliberations, the light of truth dissipates the darkness of falsehood, once teach of the things suggested for discussion are placed under judgment.