F.e. Unfortunately for Polar fans, the Venu dominates the Ignite from a screen quality perspective. No other brand is using this many LED’s to help ensure the best possible average measurement. The key thing to understand is that the screen of the Ignite will fall into standby mode when you aren’t actively using the watch. - STEPS on Garmin are quite accurate compared to Fitbit wristband trackers and esp. With the Polar Ignite, you get to enjoy all the benefits of this amazing software baked into the phone app and the desktop app. Then we have the Polar Ignite. I am confused, its been like a month of searching for a new watch since my Ionic doesn't work anymore. The whole point is to measure how well you are sleeping, and how well your autonomic nervous system is resting during your periods of sleep. I wanted to like the Polar watches because I love Polar Flow and like the sleep details etc. Reason 2: Manual Laps + Auto Laps  – The Polar Ignite is limited to automatic laps. However, it’s still nice to have the freedom to choose Garmin accessories and 3rd party accessories, if you opt for the Venu. This is another product which is leading Polar’s revival in the wearable technology space. This is another key differentiator from Polar. We’ve run through all the major differences between the two watches, and highlighted some of the best features along the way. For hardcore runners, this could be a deciding factor. This means it connects with more cycling accessories like chest straps and bicycle computers. The Garmin Venu supports ANT+ connectivity. If you’re still on the fence at this point, these simple buying tips might help you make the final call. When it comes to golf tracking, the difference between the two watches is significant. When it comes to golf tracking, the difference between the two watches is significant. The Vivoactive 4 has a pulse oximeter, which can measure your blood oxygenation levels. This is another key differentiator from Polar. Polar’s FitSpark training guides offers ready-made daily on-demand workouts that match your recovery, fitness level and training history. The whole point is to measure how well you are sleeping, and how well your autonomic nervous system is resting during your periods of sleep. The Polar Ignite has no integration with music apps. Variable 2: Skin Contact Measurement Points. Fitbit One 10.000, Garmin 11.000-12.000, Polar 20.000 ... and this has been the case all the time, not only once. Thank you, But, what should i take Garmin Venu or Polar Vantage V. I am really confused. Usually, you just have to raise the watch into a position that makes the screen easy to read in order for it to wake up automatically. Beyond ridiculous. Ultimately, the combination of a more reliable touchscreen and additional smart features like music tracking and the ability to download 3rd party apps through Garmin connect makes the Vivoactive 4 the better smartwatch overall. The Polar Ignite can track more endurance sports in total (100+ sports modes) compared to the Vivoactive 4 (20 sports modes). To help you understand which watch is better suited to your needs, we are going to unpack all the key similarities and all the key differences. I always get 1h more real sleep because Garmin doesn't recognize "awake in bed" phases. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. It’s definitely one of the key selling points of Polar’s precision prime optical heart rate technology, which is only found in the Polar Ignite, the Polar Vantage M and the Polar Vantage V. The Polar Ignite was actually the first product in Polar’s line-up to introduce their nightly recharge technology. Reason 1: 3rd Party Support for Running Power – The Garmin Venu is compatible with Stryd and RunScribe+. The Vivoactive 4 tracks activity sleep and stress levels. Moreover, this measurement is actually taken over a 28 day period, which helps to stabilize the data and identify any noticeable deviations from the norm (that could indicate that there’s a deeper issue at play and that you deeply need to get some more quality sleep). So, if you already own several cycling accessories or you want the ability to connect to 3rd party devices using ANT+ connectivity, the Venu is the better choice. The fitness tracking functions are brilliant, the optical heart monitor is a cut above the rest, and Polar’s advanced sleep tracking technology goes above and beyond it’s Garmin rival. And in regards calories count has to be really high too when the watch counts twice as many steps as you've actually walked. The Vivoactive 4 is more expensive than the Polar Ignite. The fitness tracking functions are superb, the optical heart monitor is world class, and Polar’s advanced sleep tracking technology goes above and beyond it’s Garmin rival. Really off here. The Garmin Venu is one of the best activity trackers that Garmin has ever made. While both watches have touchscreens, the Polar Ignite has received a fair amount of criticism for the rise to wake feature. - STEPS on Garmin are quite accurate compared to Fitbit wristband trackers and esp. A community for discussing Garmin hardware, software and services. Admittedly Polar have their own cycling accessories which can compete with any 3rd party equivalent. The Venu supports ANT+ connectivity. This means it connects with more cycling accessories like chest straps and bicycle computers. Official Garmin Vivoactive 4 Product Page, All the Best Garmin Forerunner 735XT Alternatives, Garmin Forerunner 735XT vs Forerunner 945 – Simple Comparison, Garmin Forerunner 745 vs Forerunner 645 – Product Comparison, Garmin Forerunner 745 vs Garmin Venu – Product Comparison, Garmin Forerunner 745 vs Forerunner 945 – Product Comparison. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Where the Garmin Venu will continue to try reading your heart rate (even when the watch is not on your wrist), the Polar Ignite is a bit smarter. While both watches have touchscreens, the Polar Ignite has received a fair amount of criticism for the rise to wake feature. The Vivoactive 4 supports ANT+ connectivity. Reason 2: Manual Laps + Auto Laps  – The Polar Ignite is limited to automatic laps. How Fitspark Works: In essence, the Ignite will serve you 2-4 workout options every day: one that suits you best and 1-3 other options to choose from. Of all the sports watches that Garmin has ever made, the Venu definitely has the most impressive screen. The Polar Ignite has no integration with music apps. This could be a deal-breaker for some users, and it’s a compelling reason to choose the Garmin Venu rather than the Polar Ignite. The key thing to understand is that the screen of the Ignite will fall into standby mode when you aren’t actively using the watch. No Garmin, Suunto or Fitbit product will do this automatically. On the other hand, the screen of the Vivoactive 4 is a bit more reliable, and it hasn’t drawn nearly as much criticism from product reviewers. There’s one main reason the Garmin Venu might be the better choice for avid cyclists. ). A few of the major differences with Polar vs Garmin: Garmin wants to be part of your ENTIRE life, with cycle tracking, daily events, etc; Polar wants to enhance your training with heart rate variability, better HR tracking, … Fitbit was good too. Compared to a Fitbit One tracker on the hips or pants Garmin watches counted about 10-20% steps more and Polar 100%. The Ignite only tracks activity and sleep levels (ie no stress tracking). The Vivoactive 4 gives you access to manual laps and automatic laps. But with strength training all watches are way off sorry, you should pair the watch with a HR chest monitor. While Garmin connect is perfectly adequate for keeping track of your fitness levels, the Polar flow app takes it to another level. Garmin has really the worst sleep tracking ever. As soon as the watch detects that it is no longer in contact with your skin, it will stop taking in measurements from the optical heart rate monitor. Ultimately, Polar have done a great job with their nightly recharge technology. Ultimately, the combination of a more reliable touchscreen and additional smart features like music tracking and the ability to download 3rd party apps through Garmin connect makes the Vivoactive 4 the better smartwatch overall. The Venu has a pulse oximeter, which can measure your blood oxygenation levels. The workouts are built to match your fitness level, training history and  recovery status (based on the quality of your sleep from the previous night). Ultimately, this could be a deal-breaker for some users, and it’s a compelling reason to choose the Vivoactive 4 over the Ignite. Polar was way better here and I read they improved it even more with the latest FW updates, - ACTIVITY No one comes close here to Garmin, all these setting like different alerts, different data fields, data screens set to what data you need. And with all trackers and after FW updates. Unfortunately that doesn’t always happen, which means you have sometimes have to touch the screen in order to wake it properly. Fitbit One 10.000, Garmin 11.000-12.000, Polar 20.000 ... and this has been the case all the time, not only once. There were 2-3 main reasons I've always sent back a Polar (Ignite, V V, V M). Hi, I need a watch for strength training and cardio, and count my calories and it should have an excellant heart rate monitor. The whole point of Garmin Coach is to create personalized training plans built by some of the most respected running coaches in the industry. And I had some hit and miss with all watches when it comes to cardio intervals training too. This is especially important when you bring price into the equation. Ultimately, Polar Flow is about as good as it gets for measuring your health and fitness levels. Reason 3: Garmin Coach Is Great for Beginners – Admittedly the Polar Ignite also has customized training plans, but for beginners specifically, Garmin Running Coach could be extremely helpful. It is literally the only watch in their line up that can go toe-to-toe with the Apple Watch from a screen resolution perspective. Ultimately, Polar’s Fitspark technology is like a more advanced version of Garmin’s guided workouts. It’s packed with sports modes, the fitness tracking modes are excellent, the screen is sharp and it has music storage. No other brand is using as many LED’s to help ensure the best possible average measurement. F.e. Because the watches are so similar from a sports and fitness perspective, you could easily just save yourself a few bucks and go for the Ignite. Conversely, the screen of the Garmin Venu hasn’t received nearly as much criticism from product reviewers. It’s packed with sports modes, the fitness tracking features are excellent, it has a gorgeous HD touchscreen and it can store music directly on the watch. There’s one main reason the Vivoactive 4 might be the better choice for avid cyclists. Moreover, this measurement is actually taken over a 28 day period, which helps to stabilize the data and identify any noticeable deviations from the norm (that could indicate that there’s a deeper issue at play and that you deeply need to get some more quality sleep). If you’re a fitness fanatic that wants challenging, custom made workouts delivered to your watch every single day, the Polar Ignite could be the perfect watch for you. The whole point of Garmin Coach is to create personalized training plans built by some of the most respected running coaches in the industry. The Polar Ignite can track more endurance sports in total (100+ sports modes) compared to the Venu (20 sports modes). 5KRunning.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.